Sunday, August 21, 2011
Dogs I've known II: Clive
After a brief sojourn in the Halls of Residence that was terminated when the cleaners found a motorcycle engine in my sink (you had to look hard; there was a lot of other stuff in there too) I shared various scruffy old houses with an assortment of scruffy young people. Way down the Cannock Road, one such joint brought me into cohabitation with Rory, a ceramicist whose enormous talent was matched only by the eccentricity of his lifestyle. We got on just fine, going so far as to pool our meager funds to buy a 56lb sack of potatoes and thus solve all our nutrition problems more or less permanently at one stroke.
Out beyond the back of the house there was a builder's yard. We never saw the guy who owned it, but one winter he set a small, skinny dog on a rope to guard the place. It was a freezing November, with penetrating rain and blasting winds, and the poor thing had no shelter. Its pitiful whining struck a chord in Rory's kindly heart, and much against the protests of the other inhabitants of the house (I never really worked out how many there were; I was shacked up with at least one of them at the time, but I think there might have been two more) he brought the bedraggled dog in.
A lively session in the bathtub ensued, as we tried to scrape enough debris off the animal to figure out which end was which and possibly what color it was. By the time we'd hosed him down and toweled his skeletal form off, we could see that at least part of him was Collie. "Smart dogs, collies," crowed Rory, "we'll make a pet of him." We called him Clive, after Clive of India.
Seldom has an animal become so devoted to his rescuer. It was heartwarming to see Clive fill out again (Rory fed him considerably better than he fed himself) and we congratulated ourselves on the boundless good karma this humanitarian act had doubtless brought us.
It was not until he started going walkies in public, a few weeks after his rescue, that it occurred to us that something might not be quite right with Clive. Perhaps because his captors the builders had been Indians, he seemed to have an issue with anyone of darker hue. This included West Indians, real Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, nuns and in fact anyone in dark clothing - including policemen. At the sight of them, he would bare what was left of his teeth and snarl like a timber wolf, straining away on his hind legs while his potential prey nervously eyed the frayed bit of clothes line that passed for a leash.
Fellow dogs excited a different kind of passion in Clive. Having been alerted to the existence of love by his miraculous rescue, he had clearly made it his life's mission to give back to his own in a direct and physical way. The sight of any dog - male, female, huge, tiny, no matter - would bring out the Barry White in him.
One fine day in West Park, the inevitable happened. Inflamed by the allure of a well-groomed Afghan hound, all silky hair and eyelashes, Clive tore at his rope hard enough to snap it. Barely pausing to register his good fortune, he streaked towards his quarry with the clearest of intents. She (or he; we never found out, though I bet Clive did) got the message while Clive was still some way off, and tore away into the park, leaving the aggrieved owner with a bruised wrist and rope burns.
It took us an hour to find Clive, but the Afghan was still AWOL when at dusk we wisely left ahead of the duly summoned police. When we found him, he seemed to have expended his ardor and was waiting peaceably under a tree, rising only to snap at passing Bengalis.
"He's got to go," I told Rory, "he's mental. He'll have us all in the dock at this rate."
Shortly after that I graduated, left that house and moved to Bristol. Some months later, I had a call from Rory. He was in town, and we met up. It turned out that he too had sensed the city's allure, and was now living in a squat up in Frenchay. "How's Clive?" I asked.
Rory looked down for a moment, then confessed. "I took him home to my parents' place" (they lived in a high-rise in the magnificently-named Spon End district of Coventry). "I told them I was going to get some milk, and left him in the lounge."
"Eerrr...how long ago was this?"
"Six months."
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Japanese antique markets
Radio in Japan
Saturday, May 21, 2011
Pachinko
Ask the average Japanese adult if they play pachinko and they'll either wrinkle up their noses in distaste or grudgingly admit "sometimes". A great many do, however - between a quarter and a third of the population, according to a recent newspaper survey - and large groups of would-be zombies queue up, waiting for parlors to open in the mornings.
There are many theories, the favorite being release of stress by self-hypnosis with flashing lights and so on, but if you ask me it is just a refuge for poor fools who don't want to be left alone with their thoughts (or families) for even a minute. Like other bizarre aspects of Japanese life (the matt black buses and trucks, for example, that are garlanded with Imperial flags and driven slowly round crowded inner-city areas while the fascist bastards inside yell messages of race hatred and mortal devotion to the emperor at volumes above the pain threshold through speakers on the roof utterly unmolested by the police, one of whom once gave me a sanctimonious lecture about freedom of speech when I complained that they were rattling my windows) pachinko is accepted as normal simply because no-one has ever thought to question it. Social commentators in the media, of course, are far too busy criticizing the West for its frivolity and wasting of natural resources.
A Japanese funeral
“He needed to see that we are alright and that we are doing everything properly.”
Bicycles in Japan
Monday, May 9, 2011
Music at the Royal Wedding
Monday, April 18, 2011
Dogs I've known: Solly the Pup
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
American cars and trains
Friday, April 8, 2011
Earthquakes in Japan: old friends
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Why houses are getting cheaper
So old Joe down the block, a 50-plus-year resident, went to the stars last Christmas. Joe's house was admittedly no great prize as he left it. He had last redecorated in about 1975, and the place sported a legendary guy basement full of a long lifetime's plunder from his place of employment, the Pennsylvania Railroad (When I first met him, ten years ago, he proudly boasted that he was still using up his vast stock of PR toilet paper. He retired in 1985). Rusting metal, bizarre home-made wiring and lots of water leaks dripping in the gloom meant you had keep your hands to yourself. Still, once his nephew had cleaned it all out, it wasn't a bad little house. It sold this spring to a very nice Mexican family, for roughly what it would have cost in 1980.
Looking around the ol' neighborhood (try Zillow.com), most other joints that have changed hands in the last year have sold for about 40% less than they would had the market remained even flat after 2007.
The big question then, pop pickers: is this a temporary lull, with the Good Times just waiting at the gate to scamper back in when the sun comes out, or a permanent re-setting of the market? The latter, in my opinion. Here's a bit of Captain Economics 101:
Any kid of ten (I have one around here somewhere) can tell you that growth-based economics is a crock. Even two percent growth, compounded, requires that your economy double in size within a lifetime - something that cannot happen unless you start out a lot poorer than we are. Once all the conquerable lands with natural resources and inadequately armed people are invaded and civilized, the only way this model continues to work is if we get to hit the re-set button every few decades. Traditionally, this was done by holding a World War; the victors got to drive the losers' economies for a while, and could thus rig things like exchange rates and trade agreements in their own favor. Presto: boom times for the winners, gradual recovery for the losers, nothing to worry about for, oh, a good 50 years.
The last time we got to do this was in 1945, and now time's up. The golden glow of WWII has long since faded, but no-one's had the nerve to start WWIII and the economy has thus been bleating for a major re-set lo these 20 years past. Seeing as we can't get it together to hold another round of global mayhem, however, various parts of it are going ahead and re-setting themselves.
Of the $220,000 average price of a house in my neighborhood four years ago, I'd say that about $40,000 was nominal value (also known in the trade as "trying it on"). That's the difference between replacement cost (which your insurance company uses to calculate your policy) and the selling cost. To buy a house like mine in outer Detroit would cost about $25,000; in Palo Alto, about $450,000. For the same house. The replacement value in both places would be similar. As you can see, Detroit features negative nominal value - houses sell for less than they cost to build, which is why no-one is building any - while in La-la Land there's almost no connection between what something is worth and what you have to pay.
A healthy housing market is one in which nominal value is no more than a certain fraction of replacement value, and I'm proud to say that my neighborhood qualifies. Which is why houses do actually sell here, and yet don't even a mile or two away, where nominal value makes up over 30% of the asking price.
Look for the housing market to start moving again when houses sell for a figure that is closer than telescope distance to their actual value. Californians - don't hold your breath...